Shinhan Card signed an MOU with the Solana Foundation, to test stablecoin payments on Solana’s testnet. It is one of nine Korean card issuers simultaneously running stablecoin pilots.
- Shinhan Card signed MOU with Solana Foundation.
- Shinhan focus: real-time PoC, non-custodial wallets, oracle technology, smart contracts.
- KB Kookmin: Avalanche hybrid card, stablecoin first, credit fills shortfall automatically.
- Hana Card: 5% cashback on USDC payments for international tourists, FX fee elimination.
- Woori Card: won-pegged stablecoin payments within Samsung Wallet.
- BC Card: interoperability pilot for domestic and international digital asset transactions.
- DABA expected: first half of 2026, 100%+ reserve requirement.
Five Problems, Five Workstreams
Read individually, each Korean card issuer running a stablecoin pilot is a separate corporate experiment. Read together, they are a coordinated infrastructure buildout solving five distinct problems simultaneously, and the division of labor is precise enough to suggest it is not accidental.
According to information from Asia Business Daily, Shinhan Card’s Solana PoC is solving the merchant acceptance problem: can a stablecoin payment work reliably at the point of sale, with the speed and stability that retail transactions require? KB Kookmin’s Avalanche hybrid card is solving the balance management problem: what happens when a customer’s stablecoin balance is insufficient? The hybrid model answers automatically, stablecoin pays first, credit covers the remainder, the user never notices the gap.
Hana Card is solving the foreign exchange problem: USDC-funded payments with 5% cashback for international tourists eliminate FX conversion fees entirely at the merchant level. Woori Card is solving the mobile distribution problem: embedding won-pegged stablecoins directly within Samsung Wallet reaches Samsung’s existing user base without requiring a new application or onboarding flow. BC Card is solving the interoperability problem: verifying that different stablecoin implementations can communicate across domestic and international payment rails.
Merchant acceptance, balance management, FX efficiency, mobile distribution, interoperability, these are exactly the five infrastructure layers that any national stablecoin payment system must build before it can function at scale. South Korea has assigned each layer to a different issuer with the specific strengths to test it. The Credit Finance Association consortium coordinating nine issuers is the organizational structure that makes this a system rather than a collection of pilots.
The Regulatory Tension Nobody Named
Hana Card is testing USDC payments, the exact foreign stablecoin that the Digital Assets Basic Act may restrict. DABA requires USDT and USDC issuers to establish local Korean branches and obtain domestic licenses before their assets can circulate freely. Hana’s pilot and the DABA restriction are presented as separate facts in every source covering this story. They are one unresolved tension.
Hana is either testing a model it expects Circle to legalize by establishing a Korean entity before DABA takes effect, or it is using USDC as a technical proof of concept that will be replaced by a DABA-compliant KRW stablecoin once the regulatory framework is clear. The source does not say which. The question determines whether Hana’s pilot is a production system or a template. If Circle does not obtain a domestic license, Hana’s USDC payment infrastructure becomes non-compliant the moment DABA is enacted. If it does, Hana has a head start on every issuer that waited for regulatory clarity before committing to a foreign stablecoin architecture.
The dual oversight structure adds a second tension. The Bank of Korea’s mandate is monetary stability. A nine-issuer consortium deploying won-pegged stablecoins at scale creates a parallel money supply that the Bank of Korea does not directly issue. The 100% reserve requirement addresses solvency. It does not address the monetary policy question of whether privately issued won-denominated stablecoins circulating at scale affect the Bank of Korea’s ability to manage the money supply. DABA’s framework answers the first question. It defers the second.
Shinhan’s Non-Custodial Test Is Architecturally Different From Every Other Pilot
Every other card issuer in the consortium is testing custodial or semi-custodial stablecoin models. KB’s hybrid card holds the stablecoin balance within the card infrastructure. Woori’s Samsung Wallet integration is a custodial wallet. BC Card’s interoperability pilot operates within managed custodial rails. The DABA reserve requirements, 100% reserves in licensed bank accounts, are designed for custodial issuers who hold user funds.
Shinhan’s Solana PoC is specifically testing non-custodial wallets, a model where users hold their own private keys and the card network is a payment rail rather than a custodian. This is not a technical nuance. It is an architectural question about who owns the asset. Non-custodial wallets do not require an issuer to hold reserves because there is no issuer holding funds. If Shinhan’s non-custodial payment test succeeds at the merchant level, the resulting model may sit outside the DABA compliance framework entirely, not because it evades regulation, but because DABA’s reserve requirements do not apply to infrastructure where no entity holds user funds in custody.
This creates a structural question the MOU does not address: is the Solana Foundation partnership building toward a DABA-compliant custodial stablecoin product, or is it building toward a non-custodial payment layer that operates independently of the regulatory framework being constructed around it? The answer determines whether Shinhan’s test is a component of South Korea’s regulated stablecoin system or a parallel architecture that predates and potentially competes with it.
What The Preliminary PoC Timeline Reveals
The April 30 MOU is not where the Shinhan-Solana relationship began. It is where it became official after five months of operational testing. A preliminary PoC completed in late 2025, followed by cross-border remittance tests with Visa and Mastercard in April 2026, preceded the signing. Institutions do not run five months of preliminary tests before a formal MOU unless the preliminary tests were determining whether the formal commitment was worth making. They were.
The DABA timeline provides the external deadline that explains the April 30 signing date. Shinhan formalized the Solana partnership before the regulatory framework that will govern stablecoin payments in South Korea is enacted. That sequencing means Shinhan is positioning its technical infrastructure ahead of the regulatory clarity rather than waiting for the law to define what is permitted. The issuers who move now, before DABA, are building institutional knowledge about what works and what does not before the rules lock in. The issuers who wait for regulatory clarity will be learning what others already know.
Five Blockchains, No Shared Settlement Layer, No Guarantee Of Compatibility
The coordinated system reading assumes the Credit Finance Association consortium is directing a unified buildout with a shared destination. The alternative reading is that nine competing card issuers are running incompatible experiments on incompatible blockchains with no common technical infrastructure and no interoperability commitment between them.
KB’s Avalanche hybrid card cannot natively settle with Shinhan’s Solana non-custodial wallet. Hana’s USDC infrastructure may be non-compliant on day one of DABA if Circle does not establish a Korean entity in time. Woori’s Samsung Wallet integration depends on Samsung’s cooperation as a third party outside the card consortium’s control. BC Card’s interoperability pilot is testing whether different implementations can communicate, which means interoperability is not yet solved, it is still being determined. What looks like a coordinated system from the outside may be five parallel workstreams building on incompatible rails that DABA will have to reconcile, force issuers to abandon, or simply leave unresolved.
The 100% reserve requirement creates a second fragmentation risk. Each issuer maintaining separate bankruptcy-remote reserve accounts at licensed banks means each issuer’s stablecoin is backed by a different reserve pool, audited separately, and redeemable only through that issuer’s infrastructure. A user holding KB’s won-stablecoin cannot redeem it through Shinhan’s infrastructure. The DABA framework as described creates five separate stablecoin ecosystems with a shared regulatory label, not one unified payment system. The coordination that the Credit Finance Association provides is organizational. The technical unification that a national payment system requires has not been built and DABA does not mandate it.
DABA Is The Shared Dependency All Nine Workstreams Are Waiting For
South Korea’s stablecoin payment infrastructure is not a future project. As of April 30, 2026, five of the nine consortium issuers have active pilots covering merchant payments, balance management, FX efficiency, mobile distribution, and interoperability. The capital gains tax has been pushed to 2027, removing the short-term tax friction that would otherwise slow adoption. The regulatory framework is weeks or months from enactment.
The confirmation signal that this infrastructure is transitioning from pilot to production is DABA enactment in the first half of 2026 followed by at least two issuers announcing commercial launch timelines within 90 days of the law passing. That combination would confirm the pilots were production preparation rather than regulatory theater. The denial signal is a DABA delay beyond the first half of 2026, which would stall the commercial timelines of all nine issuers simultaneously, since regulatory clarity is the shared dependency that all five workstreams are waiting for. The DABA timeline is the single variable that determines when South Korea’s stablecoin payment system stops being a test and starts being infrastructure.
The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Kosta joined the team in 2021 and quickly established himself with his thirst for knowledge, incredible dedication, and analytical thinking. He not only covers a wide range of current topics, but also writes excellent reviews, PR articles, and educational materials. His articles are also quoted by other news agencies.