There is a gap between finding a first-order stationary point (FOSP) and a second-order stationary point (SOSP) under differential privacy constraints, and it remains unclear whether privately finding an SOSP is more challenging than finding an FOSP. Specifically, Ganesh et al. (2023) claimed that an -SOSP can be found with , where is the dataset size, is the dimension, and is the differential privacy parameter.
However, a recent analysis revealed an issue in their saddle point escape procedure, leading to weaker guarantees.
Building on the SpiderBoost algorithm framework, we propose a new approach that uses adaptive batch sizes and incorporates the binary tree mechanism.
Our method not only corrects this issue but also improves the results for privately finding an SOSP, achieving .
This improved bound matches the state-of-the-art for finding a FOSP, suggesting that privately finding an SOSP may be achievable at no additional cost.